Blog powered by TypePad
Member since 04/2004
AddThis Social Bookmark Button

« Need for student research papers: Google library project and privacy | Main | New - Library, Bookseller, and Personal Records Privacy Act introduced by Sen. Feingold »

February 11, 2005

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341c69e553ef00d83473922e69e2

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference What do you do when the police come to your library with a missing wallet and ask for the patron's phone number? Think real hard...:

Comments

Actually, yes. If you can't learn how to follow applicable library policies and state law, then you need to find another job. That was the employee's offense - he was fired for violating library policy and state law. I don't know where you work but most places, that's plenty enough to get you canned, especially if your a probationary employee. I guess Jack thinks it's OK to violate library policies and state law so long as the employee decides that they have no problem with what they are doing.

The punishment seems harsh, but he does seem to be a slow study.

So, it's okay to fire someone for being a "slow study"?

As a matter of fact, though, it isn't a question of his being a "slow study" or his "figuring it out." What he says at the end of the article is "I have no problem with what I've done, and I would do it again."

In other words, he disagrees with your interpretation, as do at least three commenters to the article who self-identify as library workers.

Is it just that it's okay to fire people who disagree with Mary Minow and Karen G. Schneider?

No mention of a drivers licence. Not everyone has one. The library card may have had the name on it and maybe the officer could have looked in a local phone directory.

Still no excuse for breaking privacy. Ring the patron rather than hand out the number. Roberts may have liked the idea of getting his own wallet back, but he didn't think of the other side of the coin - how would he like his privacy invaded?

Um, am I overly suspicious, or do others have alarm bells going off in their heads right now?

(1)Doesn't the driver's license have identifying information, like an address, so that the police officer could just go to the phone book and look up the number?

(2)O.K., assume the number is unlisted. Doesn't the agency that issued the driver's license have that kind of information, *available to police*?

I must be missing something here.

That is the right answer. We did this all the time, and we explained to the police officer why we had to do this.

The punishment seems harsh, but he does seem to be a slow study. Among other problems, my radar would go off if a police officer came to me with that story. Sure, that could be the situation--but it could also be a set-up.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been saved. Comments are moderated and will not appear until approved by the author. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until the author has approved them.