« February 2008 | Main | April 2008 »
The final report of the Section 108 Study Group (on which I served, and before which Mary testified) is available at http://www.section108.gov/. The report examines the exceptions available in copyright law and discusses changes that may be needed in light of digital technologies.
California library folks are invited to participate in a free webcast this Thursday at noon. Others are welcome to view the webcast after it is archived.
From Red Light to Green Light: Copyright Issues in Digitizing Photographs in Library Collections
Libraries are making innovative use of their local treasures. The Library of Congress is sharing a sampling of its rich collection on Flickr, as well continuing to make its own American Memory site a must visit. If your library has been digitizing some of its treasures to put online, stop into this webcast for a concrete, understandable approach to understanding the copyright issues critical to your project.
Spend an hour of prevention watching this webcast, and minimize the chances of lengthy legal battles in the future. This webcast is recommended for all libraries participating in the Local History Digital Resources Program (LHDRP).
Critical point for all libraries:
Child pornography is NOT protected free speech. If you see someone looking at child porn in the library, call the police.
If you see only the website and no patron, you can still report it to the FBI or Cyber Tip Line 800-843-5678
Here's a point where pro-filter and pro-open access folks can agree.
Posted by Susan:
I just put the final draft of a new paper on SSRN. The paper re-assesses the Patriot Act provisions that affect libraries now that some parts of the Patriot Act have been legislatively revised, judicially interpreted, or audited for compliance. The paper is called The Chains of the Constitution and Legal Process in the Library: A Post-Patriot Reauthorization Act Assessment. If it gets published, I'm going to dedicate the paper to Lee Strickland, whose work was so helpful in drafting the paper, and who was a great friend of libraries.
The "chains of the Constitution" is a concept Thomas Jefferson came up with, as a metaphor for limiting the power of the governing class:
In questions of power, then, let no more be heard of
confidence in man, but bind him down from mischief
by the chains of the Constitution.
Here's the abstract of the paper:
Since the Patriot Act was passed in 2001, controversy has raged over nearly every provision. The controversy has been particularly intense over provisions that affect the patrons of libraries. This article follows those Patriot Act provisions that affect libraries, and reviews how they have been interpreted, how the Patriot Reauthorization Acts have changed them, and what government audits and court affidavits reveal about the use and misuse of the Patriot Act. The efforts of librarians and others opposed to the Patriot Act have had an effect, both legislatively and judicially, in changing and challenging the Patriot Act. Because libraries are such a potent symbol of democratic openness, the effect of the Patriot Act on libraries has acted in the public mind as a microcosm of the broader problems with the implementation of the Patriot Act. The public's discomfort with the civil liberties implications of the Patriot Act has turned out to be justified, as every agency that has reviewed the implementation of the Patriot Act has concluded that the government has not been able to maintain an appropriate balance between the need to protect civil liberties and the need to prevent terrorist acts. The government's list of domestic terrorist acts that have been prevented or punished is not inspiring: the entire panoply of tools authorized by the Patriot Act has not done much more than stop some home-grown right wing fringe groups and ecoterrorists. In light of the evidence of abuse of civil liberties and the questionable constitutionality of many of the Patriot Act's provisions, this paper suggests that the time for vigorous advocacy has not passed and that further legislative changes need to be made.
The paper is available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1105448. That link takes you to the abstract, and if you scroll down, you can find a link to download the paper.
New lawsuit against a library in Ohio that allegedly didn't allow a "Politics and the Pulpit" meeting/service in its meeting room. http://docs.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/ohio/ohsdce/2:2008cv00223/121378/2/
Recent Comments