Blog powered by Typepad
Member since 04/2004
AddThis Social Bookmark Button

« Librarians as mandated reporters of child abuse/neglect | Main | Why the Google Books Settlement is better than orphan works legislation »

May 14, 2009

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341c69e553ef01156f91bc51970c

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Retraction: More messiness with copyright duration of foreign works:

Comments

Peter, re: "Works published after 1922 in the countries listed in my previous post would receive a 95 year term of copyright." Just to be clear: so do restored works published after 1922 in all other countries (those not listed in the previous post), because their 75-year term would not have expired by 1998, and they thus did get the 20-year extension.

D'oh! I am going to give up on this topic - it clearly doesn't agree with me.

Thanks for the correction.

2038 or 2018? (1923+95=2018)

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment