Blog powered by Typepad
Member since 04/2004
AddThis Social Bookmark Button

« Librarians as mandated reporters of child abuse/neglect | Main | Why the Google Books Settlement is better than orphan works legislation »

May 14, 2009

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341c69e553ef01156f91bc51970c

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Retraction: More messiness with copyright duration of foreign works:

Comments

Peter, re: "Works published after 1922 in the countries listed in my previous post would receive a 95 year term of copyright." Just to be clear: so do restored works published after 1922 in all other countries (those not listed in the previous post), because their 75-year term would not have expired by 1998, and they thus did get the 20-year extension.

D'oh! I am going to give up on this topic - it clearly doesn't agree with me.

Thanks for the correction.

2038 or 2018? (1923+95=2018)

The comments to this entry are closed.