« Rate Obama's privacy record | Main | Google, libraries, and readers' privacy »


Of course, UM could always purchase the CCC license, argue any non-coverage is fair use, and then distribute all course materials through Bb. That's the future. . ..

I hadn't thought of that. So the copyshop/student may do better to put a computer onsite that students log in to, authenticated by user ID, not IP address, and print that way. Of course, we're talking about license terms, not fair use.

Perhaps. The licenses I have seen cover printing from the database itself, but not necessarily reproducing printouts from that database (or copies made from hard-copy originals).

I know, it is stupid. Either way, the student ends up with a copy of the article in her hands. But you know how it is the letter of the contract, and not the end result, that often applies in these cases.


As to the first argument, if it is the student making the copy, then the license could apply.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


Post a comment

Your Information

(Name is required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)