Books

December 19, 2007

Classics and Commons on demand - a Kindle library is now available from Feedbooks

Imagine having a free library of public domain classics in the air, and a device the size of a paperback that can download any title on the list anytime you want.  Imagine the library also has some newer creative commons licensed works.

Done.

Thank you, Feedbooks (and Teleread for telling us). Feedbooks takes advantage of Kindle's fast, free online access -- in a really innovative way.

All the Kindle user has to do is email Feedbook's "Kindle Download Guide" to [user]@kindle.com ONE TIME. That's it. The Guide has live links that then give you instant Kindle access to works by Thoreau, Tolstoy, Austen, Swift, Robert Louis Stevenson as well as Doctorow and Sterling. Searchable by using the KINDLE search function.

A better title for the Guide would be "Classics and Commons on Demand."

This content was exactly something I was thinking libraries could offer, though I was not able to imagine such a cool delivery method. 

Other ereaders can also make use of the guide, but the Kindle's EVDO delivery is what makes this really amazing.  I still stick with my recommendations that libraries get XO's instead of Kindles though.  They are extremely durable, can read more formats without conversion, and they have built-in wireless.  Users will need a hot spot to make use of that, but libraries increasingly offer free hot spots.

December 17, 2007

Kindles in libraries - the importance of ebook standards

I see at least one library is experimenting with Kindles. (Thanks, David Rothman at Teleread). I think XO's would be a much better durable choice.  Kindles are a bit too fragile, IMHO, for library use.

Critically important, though, whatever readers are chosen, that libraries choose ebooks in formats that can be transferred from one device to another.

No reason not to at least use the  .epub  standard for ebooks today. This standard is an unenrypted XML format for reflowable digital books that theoretically should let users read books on any ebook reader. David tells us that mobipocket (which Kindles can read) is finally importing .epub, so Kindle owners can benefit.  Commenters at his blog have mixed experiences with it so far.

Although I think the library's best bet is to stick with unencrypted public domain and creative commons licensed books, there may be some argument for experiment with best sellers and the like. This is where libraries should tread carefully, or we'll box ourselves into some bad corners if we buy books with DRM that only works on one device. Much as I am enamored with the Kindle right now, I don't realistically think that we know that it'll be the ticket 10 years from now, or even 2 years from now. Buying Kindle  DRM'd books means you can only read the books on the Kindle (and other Kindles registered to the same account).  Amazon should work with publishers and the IDPF to come up with an interoperable encryption standard, so libraries and users can buy books, then transfer them (yes, transfer, not duplicate) to other devices.  That way, if a library buys fiction today, it can keep the books tomorrow.

Joe Wickert at Kindleville has a cool idea - unlimited content like Rhapsody offers for music. Now that's something a library could think about if the price is right!  If it was at all comparable to rental collection pricing, that would be worth considering.   

I suppose one could look at purchasing encrypted ebooks that only work on one particular device as if it were a rental. You'd have the use of the book for a while, much shorter than the time you could keep a physical book.  The pricing would have to be quite low, but even then that would make me much more uncomfortable than a pure rental model.  Why? I think because it would shift the rules of the game, leaving libraries in deep trouble when buying books that can't be read again and again without buying them again and again.

November 30, 2007

Kindle in libraries

A friend asked me what applications I see for Kindles in libraries.  Assuming the Kindle comes down in price (a lot), libraries could load them up with public domain classics and such, and lend them out. I'd probably recommend against purchases by libraries of DRM'd content.

12/1 - BTW, what are some libraries' experiences using ebook readers with the public? I know ebooks themselves haven't been great. I've tried "borrowing" ebooks from libraries with varying success, but don't know if libraries have been letting folks borrow ebook reading equipment loaded with content.  I've read of experiments with iPod shuffles and audio, but don't know how that's been going lately. Commenters?

Added 12/6 -  I'd think libraries would have a better shot using XO laptops with patrons. See Teleread that links to Brewster Kahle's YouTube video. It's more durable (virtually indestructible), can use a hand crank for power, and supports more formats. It doesn't have the EVDO, but does have built in wireless.  And for now through Dec 31, every library that buys one automatically sends one to a child in a developing nation. (I have that reversed, but that's the way I'm looking at it in this context.) Knowing library procurement red tape, may be best for nimble Friends groups to go out and buy a few for their libraries/children in developing nations for the holidays.

November 29, 2007

Quick Kindle Review - a TEN STRIKE

I'm trying out an AMAZON KINDLE.  Love it. 

It's clearly designed by people who READ.  Delightful to read the newspaper, magazines, books, your own documents.  You can read for hours comfortably.  In fact, I believe that in many scenarios, I'd PREFER this, yes you read that right, I'd prefer the KINDLE to a real book or magazine.   That surprises me, even though I was looking for the convenience of an ebook reader (dozens or hundreds of titles), I always expected to say, "of course the paper book is a better reading experience."  That may be changing.  This not only rivals the paper experience, it surpasses it in many ways. It's EASIER to hold than a hardback, easier to turn pages with one hand than a paperback or newspaper, and that's all before the extra features.

Extra features that books don't have:  The New Oxford American Dictionary lookup is well integrated. One click gives you the line of text you're reading with all the key words neatly defined at once.  Seamless link to Amazon that allows you to download free samples of titles in the KINDLE STORE (90,000 including most best sellers - no Harry Potter unfortunately).  A few magazines and newspapers are available - all with two week free trial.  All delightfully easy on the eyes.  Then there's a rudimentary web browser so you can read free newspaper sites et al, but not designed for heavy web surfing. Or email. NOW I THINK THIS IS ACTUALLY A PLUS in a way - who needs all those distractions when you're lost in a book or lengthy article. 

Virtual reference - an experimental feature I like.  While reading Armageddon's Children, I wanted to know which was further south, Cleveland or Chicago. Within a few minutes I got the answer from NowNow. In fact, I got three replies, and all had the same final answer. Two cited wikipedia and one cited a better geographical source. I was delighted. I asked this late in the evening, mind you, and got the answer back right away - all without ever having to touch a computer.

I'm sure people who are gadget oriented will decry the obvious missing features - no touch screen, no backlight etc.  You know, if those are the tradeoffs to get that outstanding reading screen, it's worth it. It's a pleasure on the eyes. It doesn't get hot or need a recharge every couple of hours like a computer does.  It's just the right size, if you use the smallest font. It may be frustrating for folks who choose the largest font and need to turn the page every couple of paragraphs. Still, a nice feature to be able to make the font bigger if you need it.

Yes, I know about the DRM and privacy complaints, and I hear you. But you don't have to use Amazon as your source of content. I've emailed myself open documents that I want to read (10 cents a document). I've also gone to manybooks.net to get a bunch of mobipocket (or .txt) titles for free and transferred by cable - free. No tracking of my reading there. Couldn't get the SD card to work right yet, but that's supposed to work too.  I also tried to use the clunky Kindle web browser to download directly from manybooks.net - without success.

What I would like, though, is better picture quality. And more pictures/diagrams that somehow get lost on their way from print to KINDLE e.g. in the San Jose Mercury News. Color would be nice, if it had that same high quality resolution. I'd also like to be able to type a password before making purchases from the KINDLE store. Yes, there's no password needed right now. Anyone who gets their hands on someone else's KINDLE can wreak all kinds of havoc with the account. I requested a password option from customer service, and it's on their list of suggestions.

Bottom line: Very expensive, but a pleasure to read real books, magazines, documents on a portable device.

November 17, 2007

Google Book Search - has our Library Law book

Cover_2 I just discovered that Google Book Search has the library law book I coauthored with Tomas Lipinski The Library's Legal Answer Book is on "limited preview" with permisison from the publisher, ALA Editions.   I like it - it give some free pages and shows people easily how they can buy it or find in a bricks and mortar library.

April 02, 2007

Hooray - I figured out how to use tags instead of categories in this blog

As I suspected, it's much easier and more flexible.  So if any of you are looking for new posts based on categories, you may not find them. Use the technorati tags at the bottom of a post instead. If it works like I think it will, I'll probably stop using categories altogether.

Update: It looks as if users who click on a technorati tag below will get everyone in the world's posts with those tags. That's useful, but it would be nice to have an option to limit it to this blog, the way flickr does.  Well, there's always the search button in the blog...

January 28, 2006

Call for authors on legal series for librarians

Call for Authors: a new legal series for librarians and other information professionals

Tomas A. Lipinski, J.D., LL.M., Ph.D., Co-Director and Associate Professor, Center for Information Policy Research, School of Information Studies, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, and Neal Schuman Publishers, Inc., proudly announce a new series addressing the legal issues faced by librarians, information professionals and educators-The Legal Advisor for Librarians, Educators, and Information Professionals.

Dr. Lipinski and Neal-Schuman Publishers invite quality proposals from prospective authors in the areas of First Amendment issues (access to facilities, displays, censorship, etc.), privacy and USA PATRIOT Act concerns, copyright issues, ADA compliance, donor relations, the legalities of digital libraries and archives, and any related topics of interest.

From Beyond the Job

August 23, 2005

Copyright, Librarians, and the Grateful Dead

I had the good fortune to see a pre-release copy of The Complete Annotated Grateful Dead Lyrics (Free Press: forthcoming in October, 2005), shown to me by its editor and annotator, David Dodd. Dodd is also chair of the California Library Association’s Intellectual Freedom Committee, (see next blog post too) and director of the San Rafael Public Library.

Here follows a quick interview.

MM: How unusual to see a Deadhead who is a library director!

DD: Actually, there are a few of us around—there’s even a Deadhead Librarian listserv. I hear from people all the time!

MM (a little taken aback): Really. The Grateful Dead is well-known for allowing and even encouraging fans to make recordings of their live performances and even to distribute them to their friends. Did you have any problem getting permission to publish the lyrics in your book?

DD: I think that taper ethic goes a long way to differentiating the Dead from pretty much anything else in the business world. The marketing model of allowing free distribution of the music just flew in the face of all the common wisdom. In a way, the file-sharing programs that are the target of such vilification from the mainstream music business world today are the direct descendants of the Dead’s approach. That said, they have been (rightfully) quite cautious in allowing this project to go forward as a print-on-paper book. Over the years, I’ve had nothing but positive experiences with Ice Nine Publishing, who granted permission to me to use the full text of the lyrics on my Annotated Grateful Dead Lyrics website, but the permission to publish that site as a book came after a long period of having the project back-burnered. Problems, no; patience, yes.

MM: Do you think the Dead’s permissive stance on recording their music helped or hurt the band?

DD: Helped, certainly! It got the music out to huge numbers of people, and created a base of fans who were extremely knowledgeable about the music about the details of the music. From that came the whole statistics-obsessed interest in documenting every performance, and every song within every performance. The band never played the exact same concert twice, so the books that document the concerts, known as DeadBase, contain what might be thought of as fingerprints of each show. If you have a snippet of tape, and you don’t know what concert it’s from, you can probably figure it out using DeadBase. That, in turn, made for a sizeable, if not huge, market for the recordings that have steadily come forward - well-produced releases of live shows that sound much better than most concert tapes. And also, I think, it made the concert-going crowd bigger and bigger; arguably the cause of the band’s eventual downfall, but certainly a financial boost.

MM: I notice you have custom drawn illustrations. I recall you had some photos that you wanted to turn into drawings, but I don’t see them in the book. What happened?

DD: Simon and Schuster went over the book with a fine-tooth legal comb, and their conclusion about using drawings based upon photos was that they were derivative works, and that they would not be able to run unless I could locate the rights holders to the photos and gain permission. That proved to be pretty much an insurmountable permissions task—I had to clear about 100 other permissions for the book, and I just had to let go of those drawings. So - no picture of Bill “Bojangles” Robinson, Billie Holiday, Charlie Chan, or about 15 others. Also couldn’t use the drawing of the cartoon character Krazy Kat - still under copyright.

MM: What’s it like, really, to publish a book?

DD: I really think that the writing and publishing of books in the US today is a cottage industry. This is my third book, and each has carried with it a greater or lesser degree of do-it-yourselfness. The first book, an annotated bibliography about the Dead, published by Greenwood Press in 1997, was pretty much completely DIY: I delivered camera-ready copy, complete with index. The second book, The Grateful Dead Reader, published by Oxford Univ. Press in 2000, was laid out by Oxford, but my wife Diana and I did all of the permissions work on our own. We even held an Amish-style proofreading party, with a group of Deadhead writer friends spending the day going over the entire book! And this book has required that I do all the permissions work, hire a reference librarian to do fact-checking, coordinate the illustrations, and be very hands-on with the design of the book, and with the indexing. You don’t just sign a contract, turn over a manuscript, and sit back and wait for the book to appear.

MM: So, why do it?

DD: Each time, I’ve said “never again!” But I think it’s like going backpacking: you forget how painful it is, and you remember the good stuff. And if, like me, you love books, then there’s something extremely appealing about helping to make books happen. Fame and fortune are elusive, but at least I can walk into almost any public library in the country and find my books on their shelves. That’s very satisfying.

April 24, 2005

Was the "hot" librarian in Primary Colors libelous?

No, according to a New York appellate court on April 21, 2005.  Daria Carter-Clark, an adult literacy librarian in Harlem, claimed that the librarian in Joe Klein's 1996 best-selling book Primary Colors was based on her and was libelous. On April 21st, a state appellate court upheld a ruling for Random House. It said that the description of the fictional character was not so closely akin to Carter-Clark that a reader of the book, knowing the real person, would have no difficulty linking the two.

According to American Libraries Online Oct 20, 2003,   Carter-Clark and the defendants had earlier agreed that she had never had intimate relations with the president, making  testimony from Clinton unnecessary.

Daria Carter-Clark, v. Random House, Inc., SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT 2005 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4202 April 21, 2005, Entered

For the full opinion...

Continue reading "Was the "hot" librarian in Primary Colors libelous?" »

March 29, 2005

Reference source review: Books and Periodicals Online - Law, Business and News

I have the good fortune of receiving a review copy of Books and Periodicals Online: Law Business & News 2005, edited by Nuchine Nobari.  It's apparently been around for more than a decade, but I didn't know about it, even though I've been looking for such a source.

This may not reflect well on my librarian friends, but I've been unsuccessfully asking for some time (including sending formal reference requests) for a source I could use to see where a particular journal is available online.  That is, say I know I want to read an article in a recent Library Technology Reports - how do I find it?  I've never gotten a good answer - could this source be the holy grail?

Continue reading "Reference source review: Books and Periodicals Online - Law, Business and News" »