The Handbook on Copyright and Related Issues for Libraries (new - international perspective) is now available for download under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 2.0 License. It's written by Electronic Information For Libraries (eIFL.net), an independent foundation that focuses on libraries and electronic resources in developing countries. eIFL is an initiative of the Open Society Institute, part of the Soros Foundation network. The handbook is sponsored by the UNESCO Information for All Programme.
Minow take: The absolute best sections of the handbook, in my opinion, are the last three: trade agreements, international policymaking, and national policymaking. All focus directly on library impact. I always watch my students go weak in the knees when I discuss copyright and international trade agreements. This source hits the mark. It cuts right through to why and how these treaties work, and how they impact libraries and library users. It features international library statements and links to the most relevant source documents (without being overwhelming).
From the handbook: "We hope that you find the Handbook useful. If you do, please share, distribute, translate and build upon it! Teresa Hackett December 2006"
It's such a good start, someone should turn it into a wiki. That way library folks around the world can build on it (while keeping the frozen version intact, of course).
Hat tip to Jill Hurst-Wahl's Digitization 101 blog, and her student D. Harrison.
----
The table of contents also includes:
The Relationship between Copyright and Contract Law: Electronic Resources and Library Consortia
Technological Protection Measures - the "triple lock"
Copyright, the Duration of Protection and the Public Domain
Orphaned works
Collective Rights Management
Public lending right
The Database Right - Europe's Experiment
Creative Commons: an "open content" licence
Open Access to Scholarly Communications
Mary: This just came in as a comment to http://blog.librarylaw.com/librarylaw/2005/11/my_library_elf_.html but I figured no one would see it there. I think that any smart tech person could figure out how to "roll your own" RSS feeds from a library's LMS system, needing only the user's library card number and PIN (if needed to get into the records). Why do you say end users couldn't empower Elf to act on their behalf... wouldn't that be considered consent? Is consent sufficient in the UK?
What concerns me is that the users don't need to give consent if the LMS password system is weak, as it is in so many libraries in the U.S. Your ex-girlfriend needs only your library card number and sometimes a (weak) PIN (often the last four digits of your phone number). Do UK LMS companies offer stronger PINs than four digits?
Many have told me that that this weak security has always been the case, Elf or no Elf. The difference that Elf or any RSS feeds (laden with personal content) makes is the convenience of daily delivery of the records from hither and yon.
By the way, I just happened to go back to the search box in Bloglines the other day, and typed in "library elf for" and then chose [Search for Feeds] and got about 200 personal feeds from probably unwitting library users. Gives me their first names and one more click shows their libraries, books out/requested etc. At least Elf got rid of their email addresses. Still, quite disconcerting to see so much personal information floating around, free for me to capture. I could (but won't) add a screenshot of the names with the libraries and titles.BloglinesElfScreenshot.doc