« Another brick in the wall - Kahle lawsuit dismissed | Main | NRC documents pulled - some restored »


Both Martha's and your points are interesting. One thing that occurs to me is that, in the filtering case, the Court plurality was impressed "by the ease with which patrons may have the filtering software disabled." 539 U.S. at 209. There is no comparable protection for universities in the Third Circuit case; nor could there be, as the filtering case involved censorship while the Third Circuit case involved compelled speech.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


Post a comment

Your Information

(Name is required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)