« Urgent action needed re DOPA | Main | Good LJ article on ELF »


The distinction does not make sense, because libraries have typically been a public forum for ideas. The ordinance passed squelches all ideas that come from a specific class of people not approved by the writers of the ordinance. Libraries, in fact, frequently have copies of Hitler's writings, and also Karl Marx's writings. This is not a sign of approval -- it is an attempt to inform. Including gay ideas does not neccessarily indicate approval, only that information from all parties can be presented.

This distinction is a big one in constitutional law and exists in many contexts. The principle case on this is Lujan v. Defenders of Wildlife, 504 U.S. 555 (1992), which held that a person who might have wanted to visit foreign countries whose wildlife populations were (allegedly) devastated by American policies didn’t have a standing to sue.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


Post a comment

Your Information

(Name is required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)